top of page

Parliamentary

What is Parliamentary Debate?
​
Parliamentary is an on-the-spot, audience-centered debate format which stresses rigorous argumentation, logical analysis, and quick thinking. Each team consists of two individuals with both teams speaking for a total of forty minutes. Debaters are presented with their round topic and side twenty minutes prior to the start of the debate, encouraging competitors to have a breadth and depth of knowledge, as they can be forced to debate topics addressing any current political, economic, social, or philosophical issue on such short notice. While evidence plays a role in each team's case, parliamentary debaters focus on argumentation and rhetoric rather than technical rule based strategies. Debates are structured to not only argue against the validity of a team's contentions, but also against a team's mindset and assumptions of the status quo, making parliamentary an adaptable and intellectually demanding format.
Resolution Examples:​
  • The United States federal government should significantly increase its military presence in the Baltic States.

  • The United States federal government should substantially increase its investment in algae biofuels.

  • The United States Supreme Court should overturn Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission.

 

​

Round Timings:
  • Affirmative Constructive - 7 minutes

  • Opposition Constructive - 8 minutes

  • Affirmative Rebuttal - 8 minutes

  • Opposition Rebuttal - 8 minutes

  • Opposition Impact - 4 minutes

  • Affirmative Impact - 5 minutes

​

  • Prep time: 20 minutes (topic is announced 20 mins prior to round, no prep time between speeches)

BreakDown of Speeches:

 

AFFIRMATIVE CONSTRUCTIVE 

- Set the standard

- Define the terms

- Explain the plantext

Explain each contention

- Tie all points back to the standard

​

​

OPPOSITION CONSTRUCTIVE

Introduce other side of the topic

- Present a counter plan (w/ plantext)

- Explain each contention

- Identify and counter loopholes in proposition's case

- Tie all points back to the standard

​

​

AFFIRMATIVE & OPPOSITION REBUTTAL

Break down opponent's case

- Counter opposition's claims

- Bring up new evidence/arguments

- Strengthen original contentions

​

​

OPPOSITION & AFFIRMATIVE IMPACT

- Weigh impacts of opp case v.s. prop case

- Why is the counter plan better?

- Reiterate standing contentions

- Point out points proposition dropped

- Do not bring up any new information

bottom of page